Skip to main content

The Mail Asked Readers For Examples of anti-Brexit Bias. You can Guess How Twitter Responded

On 3rd October, Tory MP and junior whip Chris Heaton-Harris wrote to the vice-chancellors of all UK universities, asking that they supply the names of lecturers giving Brexit-related lectures, and also asking for content/links to those lectures (It's possible he was trying to avoid £9,250 in tuition fees but this has not been proven). 

News of this request broke this week, with many commentators rightly condemning this almost McCarthyist attempt to put pressure on universities to be more Brexit-friendly. The MP backtracked by Tuesday, saying on Twitter he “believe(s) in free speech and in having an open an vigorous debate on Brexit”. He also claimed he wanted the information “for a book”. Strangely this book wasn’t mentioned previously, it wasn’t mentioned in the letter he sent, and he used official House of Commons headed notepaper which he’s not supposed to do for personal business (but I’m sure it wasn’t a rapidly dreamt up excuse, dear me no).

The day after this furore, the party began distancing itself from Mr Heaton-Harris’ request. However, the Mail immediately took up the cudgels with a front-page splash on “OUR REMAINER UNIVERSITIES”, going on inside to list the Enemies of the People who viciously teach people facts & stuff, and to detail what it saw as, anti-Brexit bias throughout the academic world (seemingly missing the point that universities are filled with the brightest people, who are well used to researching evidence and drawing their own appropriate conclusions). They then foolishly invited readers to supply their own stories of anti-Brexit bias in universities, via email to University@dailymail.co.uk. You can imagine how Twitter took to that.

I myself responded with anger and a little sarcasm:

But of course the hivemind of Twitter always does a better job, and followed my post with some of their own. Below is a selection of the best. Unlike my own, I can’t guarantee that they were all actually sent, but I do hope so, and it’s not as if it costs a stamp.

Firstly, Freelance writer David Whitley (@mrdavidwhitley) weighed in with a few examples:





Not to be outdone, @duncamn provided his own take:



And @retalsp went with:


@bill_sich was more formal:


@TimBrudenell said:



@andrewpunton mailed in:


@UpsilonMale was rightly “Horrified”:


And finally @johnfromsoho returned to a theme I opened with – book burnings:


There were more, and I’m sure there are many more sitting in the Daily Mail inbox. I hope it gives them as much amusement as it gave some of us. Sadly I fear the selection presented here won’t make it to tomorrow’s print edition, so I reproduce them for posterity. Others more suited to their agenda may well do.

Long live the Resistance.



Mike Holden (@MikeHolden42)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

#FBPE is More than Merely a Meme

Twitter is no stranger to a hashtag or a meme – many know the hashtag was invented  on Twitter, and anyone who has had Twitter “conversations” with the Trump fanbase soon realises that memes (plus profanity and #MAGA of course) are literally all the language they have. Twitter, certainly Pre Trump/Brexit, was to quite a large extent cat videos, short jokes (don’t get me started on 280 characters – RUINED it they have, I tell you) and memes. But in the last few weeks, Twitter has gained a new meme - the hashtag #FBPE. When this one popped up in my feed, it was a curious thing. Firstly, hashtags are usually things like #MakeAMiserableFilm or #WallpaperWednedsay so their meaning is obvious(ish). They’re also often fairly short lived, being of their time, serve their purpose and quietly disappear from Twitter trends. But this one didn’t immediately make sense to me, it lasted more than a day or two – and, unusually, it was being added to Twitter users’ display names as well as tweets.

Government finally shows a path through the chaos. Several in fact.

Yesterday, government finally provided some much-needed clarity on exactly what their plans are and will be in coming weeks to break through the parliamentary deadlock, turn chaos into order and finally deliver the Holy Gail of Brexit, Do or Die. In various reports from several journalists yesterday, sources close to government and others have suggested that Prime Minister Johnson: -   Was considering bringing back a version of the Northern Ireland-only backstop. Has had meetings with the DUP in which he rejected any notion of a Northern Ireland-only backstop. Is trying to entice back into the party those Tory rebel MPs expelled under instruction from his SpAd for voting against him last week. Is appealing to One-Nation Tories to help him counter the “spears in my back” expected from the ERG & DUP when he brings a plan to parliament (those not so disillusioned with Johnson they’re quitting politics altogether, one assumes). Has begun “scoping” conversations ov

Politicians in the US and the UK are deliberately destroying politics

The US and UK elected political hierarchy are currently doing everything in their power to dismantle the institutions which they inhabit, for their own reasons. We have opened our houses to vandals. Donald Trump is doing it because he didn’t realise that the Office of President of the United States didn’t just mean the actual office with the nice chairs & stuff – it meant having responsibilities to care for and steer your country, and behave in a statesmanlike and sensible way. Sadly the words “responsibilities”, “statesmanlike” and “care” (unlike “bigly”, “covfefe” and “unpresidented”) have never been in Trump’s vocabulary. Donald Trump is Al Czervik in Caddyshack – a brash, rich, rude golf-player who doesn’t give a toss about the niceties of polite society. Except in this remake he’s also racist, mean-spirited, not at all funny and can’t dance. When a President refers to a senator as “Pocahontas” at a ceremony honouring Navajo veterans, you know it’s all gone